In the News
Reducing Animal Identification Costs in Pharma & Biotech: Why Labstamp Delivers Long-Term Savings
The Hidden Cost of “Inexpensive” Identification Methods
Many laboratories select identification methods based primarily on initial purchase price. However, methods that appear inexpensive often create hidden long-term costs.
Faded markings, lost ear tags, or healed notches can lead to animals becoming difficult to identify. When this happens, technicians must spend additional time re-marking animals or resolving identification confusion.
In more serious cases, misidentification can compromise experimental results or require additional animals to compensate for lost data.
For large pharmaceutical companies, CROs and major research institutions managing thousands of animals across multiple colonies, even small identification inefficiencies can have significant operational and financial consequences.
With this in mind, what makes a lab animal ID method cost effective?
At Somark we think this is:
- Longevity – the length of time identification lasts for and if it encompasses the length of research.
- Labour time – the labour involved in applying and maintaining the identification.
- Compliance and welfare – alignment with modern animal welfare standards.
- Error reduction –minimising mistakes that can compromise studies.
The Labstamp
Somark designed the Labstamp to be reliable, accurate and cost effective, proving that quality isn’t sacrificed with price.
The Labstamp is an automated mouse tail tattooing system which adds visual identification to the tail for ease of recognition. The permanent marks made on the tail with irradiated ink, display 3 distinct alphanumeric characters for simplicity. This alleviates the possibility of rubbed off marks or confusing identification.
Longevity
Mouse models are involved in some of the most ground breaking pharmaceutical and biotechnology studies across research, leading to life saving discoveries. The data found from this type of research needs to be accurate to be validated and progress further.
An ID system that remains readable and functional throughout the entire study lifecycle dramatically reduces retagging, technician time, stress to animals, and the risk of identification errors that can compromise research outcomes.
Long term reliability is fundamental in breeding and longitudinal studies, so there is no space for short term ID solutions in a modern workflow.
The European Commission noted in a report from 2024, that although the number of animals used in research had seen an overall decrease, around 850,000 animals were bred to maintain genetically altered germlines. This highlights the importance of having an identification system that lasts through generations to maintain studies. Any loss or confusion of individual animals within these lines could lead to significant operational and financial consequences.
The Labstamp marks are applied once and last forever, so introducing the Labstamp to your workflows can play a vital role in the long-term reliability of your processes.
Time
Efficiency is another major contributor to the true cost of animal identification.
Labstamp’s automated application process takes less than 30 seconds, requiring minimal training while reducing handling time for animals. When animals need to be identified, visualisation is an equally speedy process.
Somark completed a study to prove how visualisation ease enhanced workflows. Somark compared the identification of 4 mice in one cage that had been Labstamped to common industry methods.
We found that Labstamp visualisation took just 37 seconds, in comparison to ear notching which took 1 minute 6 seconds or sharpies that take 52 seconds to read. Projecting that to large animal numbers, hours of valuable staff handler time can be saved with the Labstamp’s efficient workflow.
Time savings make Labstamp a cost-effective alternative to slower identification methods by improving staff productivity.
Reducing Identification Errors
One of the most expensive risks in animal research is misidentification.
Traditional identification methods such as ear tags and notching can produce error rates of 20–30%, often caused by tags falling out, misreading, marks fading, or notches healing over time.
Labstamp dramatically reduces this risk, lowering identification error rates to around 3%.
By reducing identification errors, laboratories can protect study integrity, avoid unnecessary animal use and prevent costly disruptions to research programmes.
Compliance
In recent years, there has been a focus shift on lab animal welfare compliance. Not following compliance legislation could lead to study failures or costly restarts. The mindset behind the 3R’s should shift toward recognising the value of compliance rather than simply meeting standards.
Labstamp technology was developed with the motivation to improve animal welfare through limited handling, and mitigating tissue trauma and infection from tags or notching. By reducing harm to animals, research experiments may run smoothly without having to replace animal subjects or compensate for ethical deviance.
Long-Term Savings with Labstamp
When evaluating animal identification systems, laboratories often focus on initial equipment cost. However, the true cost of identification is determined by how well the system performs over time.
Labstamp helps research facilities reduce long-term operational costs by providing:
- Permanent identification that eliminates repeated marking
- Faster workflows that reduce technician workload
- Lower identification error rates that protect research integrity
- Welfare-aligned practices that support compliance
Together, these advantages make Labstamp a cost-effective long-term solution for animal identification in pharmaceutical, biotechnology and academic research facilities.
